Why Relying on Google PageRank is Wrong

During my journey in make money online, I have concluded that one of the major mistakes that people are keep doing is to rely your online money making campaign on Google PageRank.

Totally misleading and entirely wrong decision. Why?

PageRank, as you might already knew, is a measurement from 1 to 10 of how Google rank sites based on their popularity, of course, in the eyes of Google. Having a PageRank 7 is way much better than having a PageRank 3.

Does having a high PageRank help you rank higher in search engine result pages? Not necessarily.

There are PageRank 0 web pages that rank #1 on a certain keyword, because it’s popular in the eyes of Google. For instance, getting linked by an .edu (educational sites) is worth more than even 1000 .com links.

So again, PageRank is not related to your ability to rake in traffic.

One of my blogs received about 700 visits with 400 uniques every day with a PageRank 3, while my other blogs only receive about 100 visits with 50 uniques every day with a PageRank 5. Who makes more money? No brainer – the former one.

You see, all I can do with a PageRank 5 is selling links (90% links with dofollow attribute,) while I can do much more thing with my PageRank 3 site with good incoming traffic from search engines.

Of course, having a PageRank 5 with high traffic is very desirable, but it’s not the case that everyone can achieve ;)

So, a conclusion: Will having a high PageRank help? Yes – It might get you good money on limited time (until you get caught by Google selling links, and penalised your PageRank) and it’s good for your ego :) (It’s a standard uses by many to measure SEO and link building success.)

Having said that, can I rely on PageRank? Of course not, if your vision is long term. If your make money onilne method involves buying dropped domains with high PageRank, sell links, and forget, this could be very, very lucrative ;)

I do try that before – buy a PageRank 5 domain name, set a simple site, sell links, and rake in dollars after dollars, until it gets Page Rank 0 – penalised by Google for selling links :D

Believe me, link building and SEO are worthless in the above case – On that site, I’ve build well from nothing to something and have several PR6 backlinks with almost 15,000 in back links. Plain useless, if you sell links…

So, there you go. Will you rely on Google PageRank to make money online? You could, but you will become what a colleague called me before: A link pimp. ‘Your choice…

Share and bookmark:
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks

Related posts:

  1. How to calculate PageRank
  2. Google page rank
  3. Is it good having links from Pagerank 0?
  4. Protect your search engine rank
  5. Profit from selling website

22 comment(s)

  • May 3, 2009 by Boris from Niche Phoenix SEO

    I am no fan of Page Rank. I have pages with no Page Rank that have bunches of do follow links to them and 0 PR but the pages rank extremely well. So I don’t pay attention to PR just rankings and traffic.

  • May 4, 2009 by Ed

    Spot on! I like the phrase ‘A link pimp’ I’m going to use that one.

  • May 4, 2009 by admin

    Thanks Ed! :)

  • May 16, 2009 by admin

    Boris, I agree - I've relied on Page Rank for quite a long time in the past, and doing so is really disappointing. PR, to me, is just an indicator - traffic and SERPs position are kings!

  • May 17, 2009 by whitey from camaros

    i have to agree with you about the page rank thing, its not exactly fair. however being able to do seo on your own gets tougher and tougher nowadays

  • May 18, 2009 by admin

    Hi whitey, Yes - I admit that SEOing your site is getting harder and harder these days - thanks to the growing importance of SERP and the willingness of site owners to throw thousands of dollar for SEO purposes. I think about it this way: If you want to rank 1st on Google SERP with the same keywords I target, you spend X amount of money. If I want to beat you, I have to spend >X logically. This way, SEO services is getting more and more expensive and harder to do, as well.

  • May 28, 2009 by Thomas from FastSize Extender Review

    I don’t think that pagerank is totally useless. It is a very important money making factor for the bloggers who do sponsored reviews!

  • Jun 1, 2009 by Kris from website marketing

    You are very right PR means nothing. Personally I beat out websites in the make money niche all the time with my PR 1 online business blog and PR2 website. In fact the top site in the make money niche is grizzlies blog which has a PR of 2 yet stays on top beating out PR 5,6, and even 7 sites. I was amazed to find it beat out forbes. Anyway excellent post, PR is not worthless though selling a link on a PR 5 or 6 will bring in alot more money than selling a link on a PR 2 or 3, I shouldn’t talk like that though since buying and selling links are against google webmaster guidelines;)

  • Jun 4, 2009 by admin

    Thomas, No - not totally useless. However relying on it is useless - If you have a money making PR5 site and you start doing paid reviews and selling links, you will find - sooner or later - your PR drops. Google seems to hate anything related to monetizing your sites by relying on PR. Thanks for your opinion :)

  • Jun 4, 2009 by admin

    Kris, I agree. One of my colleague is even making $2000+ a month from his PR0 site! I've also sell links before, using PR as leverage. End result: Most of my PR selling sites are dropped in PR, many to PR0. LOL!

  • Jun 4, 2009 by Dave from DIY Bathroom

    Would Google punish a high PR site even if they are link because they want to share sites. (not money reasons). How does it tell if a site is linking to share PR or linking to share info naturally?

  • Jun 7, 2009 by admin

    Dave, Your question is a controversial issue among SEO specialists and web masters :) Google does have a system in place to "read" your page code for "blacklisted keywords" such as "purchase a link," "buy a link," and such. Some, including me, suspect that Google does that on random basis, as not all sites with "link selling for PR" practice are being penalized by Google. The safest way to ensure your site preserves its PR is by having ALL outbound links to use "nofollow" tag :)

  • Jun 8, 2009 by caitlin from uk web hosting

    Interesting post. I’ll have to rethink page rank. Thanks for the info!

  • Jun 24, 2009 by Rod from Tri Nations Rugby

    Selling links is not worth it if you value your long-term future with Google. Sooner or later they’re going to catch up with you, and as you say, your domain becomes worthless after you get banned.

  • Jul 8, 2009 by Lucien Piccard

    i have to agree with you about the page rank thing, its not exactly fair

  • Jul 13, 2009 by admin

    Lucien, Yes - Some people rant how Google is playing God. My take: People rant because they don't know the risk they are exposed to. If people gain more understanding on how Google PageRank works, they can take precautions if they decide to do with anything related to Google PR :)

  • Jul 21, 2009 by Jean from ZineGuru Website Marketing

    Nice post. I believe PageRank(PR) should only be part of a link building campaign. PR juice is nice to have but focusing entirely on that little green bar is not the way to go as there are other benefits of getting links like instant direct traffic. Small PR sites can give loads of traffic as well. So PR might not be the most accurate way of evaluating a website’s traffic levels.

  • Jul 26, 2009 by admin

    Jean, Spot on - PR and traffic are not really related, after all... In advertising terms, focusing on PR will attract you PR juice-seeking advertisers, that IMO are not as "everlasing" as traffic-based advertising.

  • Jul 27, 2009 by Jean from ZineGuru Website Marketing

    I completely agree with what you said about PR and traffic being unrelated but sometimes you will notice that some high PageRank sites usually have tons of traffic for instance most if not all PR 8-9 authority sites have tons of traffic with alexa ranking under 1000. But like I said, PR is not the most concise way to judge traffic levels and I wouldn’t use it for this purpose. For example, you can have a PR 4 website with an alexa of 500,000 and on the other hand a PR 2 website with an alexa of 30,000. The PR 2 is higher traffic. So in some cases, PR is totally misleading. You’d still be better off with Alexa for better traffic analysis even though Alexa might not be 100% accurate.

    I definitely agree about traffic-based advertising and it’s a smart marketing strategy. If you were to buy advertising for the sake of PR juice, it’s not a too good idea as PR can fluctuate and your advertising might only be for short term. Focusing on the traffic aspect can yield a better return on investment(ROI).

  • Aug 4, 2009 by Simon from Rugby Training

    Page rank was much more valid for making money a few years back when you could easily sell out without the risk of losing it. As far as ranking goes though, relevance of backlinks has more importance than pr of backlinks. PR of page itself has very little relevance, look at the pr of the site ranking 1st for Make Money Online…Griz is a legend, but it shows PR is not important for ranking.

  • Aug 7, 2009 by admin

    Agreed - Today, if Google see your dofollow links unnecessarily on your blog, your will be penalised. And yes, relevance is king...

  • Nov 26, 2009 by nakliyat

    Of course, having a PageRank 5 with high traffic is very desirable, but it’s not the case that everyone can achieve

  • Any feedback from you?

    This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.

May 3, 2009 by admin

WEB HOSTING COUPON CODES:

HostGator 20% OFF first order - Code: AUTUMN

HostGator 1-cent web hosting - Code: hgc25

HostGator 20% OFF initial order - Code: GREEN

GreenGeeks 10% OFF - Code: 10off

Super Green Hosting HostGator GreenGeeks HostPapa green web hosting ad